In a world where technology often overshadows traditional methods, the debate between GPS tracking and boots-on-the-ground surveillance is more relevant than ever. While many believe that simply attaching a GPS device can provide real-time insights into a subject’s movements, this approach is fundamentally flawed. Discover why ethical investigators like Patrick L Bailey II prioritize human observation over invasive tracking methods. From legal risks to the undeniable proof that only traditional surveillance can provide, learn how a well-coordinated investigative team uncovers the truth every time, ensuring integrity and professionalism in every case.